Designed in the USA, Made in China: Why Apple Can’t Escape Its Supply Chain

The American Dream, Built in China

Every iPhone carries a distinct label: "Designed in California." While the device’s sleek innovation is undeniably American, its production story stretches across the globe to China — the very country now at the center of rising U.S. tariffs under President Donald Trump's administration. Some tariffs on Chinese imports have now soared to 245%.

Apple, which sells over 220 million iPhones annually, relies heavily on Chinese manufacturing. Estimates suggest around 90% of its devices, from iPhones to MacBooks, are assembled in China, where components such as screens and batteries are produced before being shipped to the U.S., Apple’s biggest market.

Recently, smartphones, computers, and other electronic goods were temporarily spared from the latest tariff hikes. Yet this reprieve appears temporary. Trump warned that new tariffs are imminent, emphasizing that "nobody is getting off the hook," as investigations target the entire electronics supply chain, including semiconductors.

Apple’s globally celebrated supply chain — once viewed as a strategic advantage — is now exposing the company to substantial risks. As U.S.–China economic tensions escalate, a critical question emerges: who depends more on whom?

When Opportunity Turns into Vulnerability

China reaped enormous benefits by hosting Apple's manufacturing operations, enhancing its reputation for high-quality production and driving technological innovation domestically.

Apple’s foray into China began modestly in the 1990s through third-party vendors. By 1997, as Apple teetered on the brink of collapse, it found new life by tapping into China’s expanding manufacturing sector.

The real turning point came in 2001 when Apple formally entered the Chinese market via a Shanghai-based trading partner and joined forces with Foxconn, a Taiwanese company operating factories in China. Together, they launched a production line that evolved from iPods to iMacs and eventually iPhones.

Cultivating China's Manufacturing Ecosystem

China’s opening to global trade, strongly encouraged by the U.S., coincided with Apple’s expansion. Although initially unequipped for advanced electronics manufacturing, China rapidly adapted. Apple cultivated a network of suppliers, helping companies like Beijing Jingdiao evolve from simple acrylic cutters to major producers of high-precision machinery crucial for smartphone manufacturing.

Apple's first Chinese retail store opened in Beijing in 2008 — the same year as the Beijing Olympics — amid a flourishing relationship between China and the West. Demand surged, and today Apple operates about 50 stores across China.

Foxconn’s "iPhone City" in Zhengzhou now represents the largest iPhone production facility worldwide. Meanwhile, Apple's complex supply chain extends to Taiwan’s TSMC, which produces its advanced chips, and involves rare earth materials essential for device features like cameras and speakers.

An analysis by Nikkei Asia in 2024 revealed that out of Apple’s top 187 suppliers, 150 maintain factories in China. As Apple CEO Tim Cook noted last year, "There’s no supply chain more important to us than China’s."

Tariff Threats: Strategic Push or Wishful Thinking?

During Trump’s first term, Apple managed to secure exemptions from some tariffs. However, this time the administration initially singled out the tech giant before walking back tariffs on electronics.

The White House’s message is clear: to diminish reliance on China. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested earlier this month that even labor-intensive assembly tasks would soon migrate to the U.S.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reinforced the stance, saying Trump’s goal is to "onshore" production of critical technologies like semiconductors, smartphones, and laptops.

Can Apple Really Come Home?

Still, many experts remain deeply skeptical.

Relocating iPhone assembly to the U.S. is "pure fantasy," according to Eli Friedman, a former advisor to Apple's academic board. He explained that while Apple has long discussed diversifying its manufacturing base — notably after China’s strict COVID-19 lockdowns disrupted production — actual progress has been slow. New assembly lines have emerged in Vietnam and India, but the bulk of manufacturing remains firmly anchored in China.

Apple did not respond to inquiries for this article, but states on its website that its supply network spans "thousands of businesses across more than 50 countries."

Facing a Tough Road Ahead

Any significant reshuffle of Apple’s manufacturing footprint would deal a severe blow to China, which is seeking to reinvigorate its post-pandemic economy. China's original motives for welcoming foreign manufacturers — job creation and global trade dominance — are just as critical now as they were two decades ago.

Apple’s entanglement in U.S.-China tensions vividly illustrates the downside of supply chain globalization, according to supply chain consultant Jigar Dixit. As retaliation for U.S. tariffs, China has imposed its own heavy levies and introduced export restrictions on essential rare earth minerals, dealing another blow to U.S. manufacturers.

The Limits of Diversification

The broader effects are still unfolding. Trump's tariffs aren't just targeting China — countries like Vietnam, key to Apple’s diversification strategy, have also faced steep tariffs, though a 90-day reprieve has temporarily delayed some measures.

Relocating Apple's mammoth-scale assembly operations outside Asia presents extraordinary challenges. As Friedman points out, all realistic options for hosting massive Foxconn-like facilities still lie in Asia, and now all face increased tariffs.

Apple’s Narrowing Options

Meanwhile, competition from Chinese brands such as Huawei, Xiaomi, and Oppo is intensifying. With Apple's supply chain now effectively aiding local firms, Chinese rivals are rapidly innovating and seizing market share.

Last year, Apple lost its crown as China’s top smartphone brand to Huawei and Vivo. Weak consumer spending, a sluggish economy, and Apple's struggles to introduce AI-powered features — a trend complicated by China's ban on tools like ChatGPT — have further eroded its position. In a rare move, Apple even offered significant iPhone discounts in January to boost sales.

Navigating President Xi Jinping’s increasingly stringent regulatory environment has also proved challenging. Apple has been pressured to restrict features like AirDrop and Bluetooth sharing to comply with censorship demands and has weathered broader crackdowns on the tech sector.

Despite announcing a $500 billion investment plan for the U.S., Apple may find this insufficient to satisfy the Trump administration’s demands for reshoring production.

Given Trump's unpredictable tariff strategy, Apple faces the real possibility of further disruptive policy shifts. Even if smartphone tariffs would not cripple the company, they would add significant operational and political pressure to a supply chain that cannot easily or quickly be restructured.

As Friedman summed up, the immediate crisis may have been postponed with the recent tariff exemptions — but Apple’s underlying vulnerability remains as exposed as ever.

Conclusion: A Delicate Balancing Act

Apple's manufacturing dependency on China is not just a result of convenience but the outcome of decades-long investments and deep-rooted partnerships. While the rhetoric of reshoring production to the U.S. grows louder, the practicalities remain formidable.

Trump’s tariff strategy, along with geopolitical instability and emerging competition from Chinese tech giants, puts Apple in an increasingly precarious position. The path forward will likely involve a careful balancing act: maintaining critical operations in China while accelerating diversification efforts to countries like India and Vietnam — all while managing political pressures at home.

In the short term, Apple may weather these storms. But in the long run, its future may depend on how swiftly and strategically it can reconfigure its global supply chain — without compromising the quality, scale, or profitability that made it a tech titan to begin with.

📩 Subscribe now to receive our latest analysis straight to your inbox —